Whilst the 1% average annual risk of MGUS developing into MM or a related condition is well documented  progression among individual MGUS patients is highly variable . Therefore, recognition of risk factors for progression is of clear benefit. Not only does this allow the identification of patients at highest risk, who will benefit most from close monitoring, it also provides reassurance to patients at low risk who do not need to be subjected to further tests. A summary of known risk factors is presented in Table 13.1.
|Blade 1992 ||128||No||No (n=105)||IgA>IgG, IgM||Unknown||No|
|Baldini 1996 ||335||Yes||Yes||No||Yes (uBJP)||Yes (classical immunoparesis)|
|Cesana 2002 ||1104||No||Yes||No||Yes (uBJP)||Yes (classical immunoparesis)||Increased ESR|
|Mayo Clinic 2002 ,|
and 2013 
|1384||Yes||No (n=160)||IgA, IgM>IgG||No (uBJP)|
Yes (sFLC ratio)
|No (classical immunoparesis)|
Yes (HLC pair suppression)
|Rosinol 2007 ||359||Yes||No (n=228)||IgA>IgG, IgM||Unknown||Unknown||Evolving MGUS|
|Perez-Persona 2007 ||407||No||No||No||No (uBJP)||No||% aPC/BMPC|
|Perez-Persona 2010 ||311||Unknown||Yes||Unknown||Unknown||Unknown||% aPC/BMPC|
|Turesson 2014 ||728||Yes||Unknown||No||Yes (sFLC ratio)||Yes (classical immunoparesis)|
Table 13.1. Summary of risk factors for MGUS progression identified by multivariate analysis. Yes: significant risk factor; No: non-significant risk factor; uBJP: urinary Bence Jones protein; aPC: aberrant plasma cells; BMPC: bone marrow plasma cells; HLC: immunoglobulin heavy/light chain (Hevylite); ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
In the largest study to date, the long-term outcome of 1384 individuals with MGUS was assessed by Kyle et al. . Patients enrolled between 1960 and 1994 were followed up for a median of 15.4 years (range: 0 – 35 years), during which time 115 had progressed to MM or a related condition, a rate of approximately 1% per year. The most important prognostic factor for progression was the initial size of the serum monoclonal protein (>15 g/L). Immunoglobulin class was also important; individuals with monoclonal IgM and IgA, but not IgG, were 5 times more likely to progress.
Cesana et al.  reported that at MGUS diagnosis, a bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) percentage of 6 – 9% carried twice the risk of MGUS progression compared with ≤5% BMPCs. Perez-Persona et al.  characterised the phenotype of BMPCs in 407 MGUS patients using multiparameteric flow cytometry. Aberrant plasma cells (aPC) were defined by the absence of CD19 and/or CD45, decreased expression of CD38, and overexpression of CD56. Using multivariate analysis, ≥95% aPC/total BMPCs, together with DNA aneuploidy, identified MGUS patients with the highest risk of progression .
The presence of urinary Bence Jones protein (uBJP, monoclonal FLCs) was highlighted as risk factor in several, but not all studies (Table 13.1). In part, this may be related to the problems obtaining a urine sample (Chapter 24). For example, in the study of 1384 MGUS patients by Kyle et al.  urine data was unavailable for 70% of patients, and the presence of uBJP failed to reach statistical significance. Since the introduction of sFLC assays into routine practice, the κ/λ sFLC ratio has been identified as a more reliable prognostic marker.
13.2.1. Prognostic value of serum FLCs in MGUS measured sFLCs in serum samples from 1148 MGUS patients at diagnosis by using archived (frozen) sera that had been collected from the original Kyle et al. cohort of 1384 MGUS patients . An abnormal κ/λ sFLC ratio (<0.26 or >1.65) was detected in 379 (33%) cases at diagnosis. At a median follow-up of 15 years, malignant progression to MM or a related condition had occurred in 87 (7.6%) patients. The risk of progression in patients with abnormal sFLC κ/λ ratios was significantly higher (hazard ratio 2.6) than in patients with normal ratios, and was independent of the size and type of the monoclonal protein (Figure 13.1. ). Furthermore, the risk of progression increased as κ/λ ratios became more extreme Figure 13.2.
The prognostic value of baseline sFLC measurements has been validated in a number of other studies . For example, in a retrospective study Turesson et al.  monitored 728 Swedish MGUS patients for up to 30 years (median 10 years). During which time, 84 patients developed a lymphoid disorder, with MM accounting for the majority (53/84) of cases. The κ/λ sFLC ratio was abnormal in 47% of the study population at baseline. Three risk factors were significantly associated with progression: an abnormal κ/λ sFLC ratio, monoclonal protein concentration (>15 g/L) and a reduction of one or two uninvolved immunoglobulin isotypes (immunoparesis). No association was found between the monoclonal protein isotype and risk of progression, which is in contrast to some previous reports , but in keeping with those of the Spanish PETHEMA group . This Spanish group also previously identified immunoparesis as a significant risk factor for MGUS progression in univariate but not multivariate analysis .
Rajkumar et al.  constructed an MGUS risk stratification model based on the size and type of monoclonal protein, and the presence of an abnormal κ/λ sFLC ratio at diagnosis (Table 13.2 and Figure 13.3. Using this model, low-risk patients were characterised as those with a small (<15 g/L) IgG monoclonal protein and a normal sFLC ratio. Such patients had a 2% absolute risk of disease progression at 20 years when competing causes of death were taken into account. Importantly, this low-risk group accounted for approximately 40% of the cohort. A smaller group of high-risk patients were identified as those with a large (>15 g/L) IgA or IgM monoclonal protein and an abnormal sFLC ratio. These patients had a 27% absolute risk of progression at 20 years.
|Risk of progression||No. of abnormal risk factors||No. of patients||Absolute risk of progression at 20 years*|
|* Accounting for death as a competing risk.
The three risk factors are defined as an abnormal κ/λ sFLC ratio (<0.26 or >1.65), a high serum monoclonal protein concentration (>15 g/L), and a non–IgG subtype (IgA or IgM).
Table 13.2. Risk stratification model to predict progression of MGUS .
International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines  recommend that patients with MGUS should be risk stratified at diagnosis to optimise counselling and follow-up, using the risk-stratification model outlined in Table 13.2 (see Chapter 25, Table 25.3). For patients with low-risk MGUS, follow-up is recommended at 6 months initially and, if stable, every 2 - 3 years or when symptoms suggest evidence of a plasma cell malignancy. For these patients, a baseline bone marrow examination or skeletal radiography is not routinely indicated. For patients with intermediate- and high-risk MGUS, follow-up is recommended at 6 months initially, then annually and/or upon any change in the patient's clinical condition. A bone marrow aspirate and biopsy should also be carried out at baseline to rule out any underlying plasma cell malignancy .
In future, additional markers may be added to risk stratification models to better define high-risk patients. Rawstron et al.  have recently showed that plasma cell phenotype (CD138/38/45 expression) and sFLCs provide independent and complementary prognostic information on the risk of progression. The use of additional genetic risk factors (including light chain gene rearrangements  and gene expression profiles ) are currently being investigated.
13.2.2. Prognostic value of Hevylite in MGUS
Suppression of uninvolved, polyclonal immunoglobulins (classical immunoparesis) has been identified as a risk factor of MGUS progression in some , but not in all studies . Using HLC immmunoassays, it is possible to measure the isotype-specific suppression of the uninvolved HLC pair (e.g. suppression of IgAλ in an IgAκ patient) (Section 11.2). Emerging evidence suggests that this ‘HLC pair suppression’ may have prognostic importance in MGUS patients.
In a preliminary study, Katzmann et al.  analysed HLC results from 105 IgG and 28 IgA MGUS patients. For the purposes of analysis the samples were separated into 3 different groups: initial samples from patients with stable MGUS, initial samples from patients with MGUS which progressed, and samples collected shortly before progression was diagnosed (Table 13.3). For the IgG MGUS patients, HLC ratio abnormalities and HLC pair suppression were increased in patients at greater risk of progression and the pair suppression was greater than the general immunoparesis. For the IgA MGUS patients the results were clearly different; ratio abnormalities were close to 100% in all groups and while HLC pair suppression was higher in subjects at greater risk of progression, the frequency of general immunoparesis was almost identical (Table 13.3).
|IgG MGUS||n||Abnormal IgGκ/IgGλ HLC ratio (%)||IgA or IgM suppression (%)||HLC pair suppression (%)|
|IgA MGUS||n||Abnormal IgAκ/IgAλ HLC ratio (%)||IgG or IgM suppression (%)||HLC pair suppression (%)|
Table 13.3. HLC pair suppression compared to classical immunoparesis in IgG and IgA MGUS . Suppression is defined as below the lower limit of the normal reference range. * Initial diagnostic sera from Olmsted County study of MGUS; ** pre-MM sample from NIH PLCO cohort.
In a second and much larger study, Katzmann et al.  investigated the prognostic significance of HLC analysis utilising 999 MGUS patient samples taken at diagnosis. These were cryopreserved sera collected from the 1384 MGUS patients who had participated in the earlier, Kyle et al. MGUS study . An abnormal HLC ratio was identified in two-thirds of patients. The frequency depended on the monoclonal protein isotype (Table 13.4): an abnormal HLC ratio was present in at least 90% of IgA and IgM MGUS patients, but in only 56% of IgG MGUS patients. The insensitivity of IgG HLC for IgG MGUS is thought to be due to the higher concentration of background polyclonal IgG compared with IgA and IgM (Section 11.5.3). HLC pair suppression (defined as an uninvolved HLC concentration below the lower normal limit) was present in 27% of patients overall, this represented a higher frequency than classical immunoparesis, which was present in only 11% of cases.
|MGUS isotype||Monoclonal protein|
Table 13.4. Frequency of abnormal HLC ratios and HLC pair suppression in IgG, IgA and IgM MGUS .
|Prognostic factor||Hazard ratio|
|HLC pair suppression|
|Serum monoclonal protein |
size ≥15 g/L
|Abnormal κ/λ sFLC ratio|
|IgA or IgM heavy chain isotype|
Table 13.5. Prognostic factors for progression of MGUS to
MM identified by multivariate analysis . and Pika et al. . In the initial study by Jiménez et al. , 248 MGUS patients were initially grouped as low- to high-risk based on the Rajkumar et al. MGUS risk stratification model . The incidence of HLC pair suppression increased with MGUS risk group (Figure 13.5) Moreover, in IgG MGUS patients, both the HLC ratio and the degree of HLC pair suppression became more extreme in higher risk groups (Figure 13.6). In a follow-on study by the same group , patients with severe HLC pair suppression (defined as values 50% below the lower limit of normal) were found to have a higher risk of malignant progression during follow-up than those without severe HLC pair suppression (p=0.023). In contrast, the presence of classical immunoparesis was not prognostic.
Espiño et al.  found that in IgG MGUS patients, the frequency of involved/uninvolved HLC ratios above 9.5 correlated with the classification of evolving/non-evolving MGUS proposed by Rosinal et al.  (p<0.001) (Figure 13.7). Moreover, all patients that actually progressed to MM during the study had an involved/uninvolved HLC ratio above 9.5 at MGUS diagnosis. The authors speculated that suppression of normal plasma cells, indicated by HLC pair-suppression, may be a prerequisite for malignant transformation of MGUS. This may be particularly important for IgG MGUS, due to the high levels of normal IgG-secreting plasma cells that would otherwise prevent invasion of bone marrow niches by tumour cells . In the future, HLC assays may be used routinely alongside sFLC analysis and other prognostic markers, to guide the optimal follow-up of MGUS patients.